ACTIVITY
PERMITS VALUATION
Get several free quotes from best contractors in your area.
| Content | Date | Cost | Contractor Rank | Address | Contractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Appellant disputes the validity of the violations contained in the attached notice. Date: May 28, 2014Client: Knockwood Associates Lp | Applicant: Joshua Horvitz, Esq. | Permit type: Appeal | Permit status: Sustained | Permit id: 22873 | |||||
The decision of the philadelphia historical commission was erroneous as a matter of law and based on the factual evidence. Appellant reserves the right to present additional evidence and reasons for this appeal. Date: July 31, 2015Client: Knockwood Associates Lp | Applicant: S.David Fineman, Esq. And Josh Horovitz, Esq. | Permit type: Appeal | Permit status: Sustained | Permit id: 25788 | |||||
The decision of the philadelphia historical commission was erroneous as a matter of law and based on the factual evidence. Appellant reserves the right to present additional evidence and reasons for this appeal. Date: July 31, 2015Client: Knockwood Associates Lp | Applicant: S.David Fineman, Esq. And Josh Horovitz, Esq. | Permit type: Appeal | Permit status: Sustained | Permit id: 25788 | |||||
Appellant disputes the validity of the violations contained in the attached notice. Date: May 28, 2014Client: Knockwood Associates Lp | Applicant: Joshua Horvitz, Esq. | Permit type: Appeal | Permit status: Sustained | Permit id: 22873 |