Currently 6 legal lots in one, contiguous ownership. This lds is to reconfigure and consolidate the lots. After approval, the property will contain 2 lots and an open space resource tract.

Currently 6 legal lots in one, contiguous ownership. This lds is to reconfigure and consolidate the lots. After approval, the property will contain 2 lots and an open space resource tract.

Currently 6 legal lots in one, contiguous ownership. This lds is to reconfigure and consolidate the lots. After approval, the property will contain 2 lots and an open space resource tract.

Currently 6 legal lots in one, contiguous ownership. This lds is to reconfigure and consolidate the lots. After approval, the property will contain 2 lots and an open space resource tract.

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Luba intent to appeal-it is the decision of the hearings officer to adopt and incorporate into this decision the hearings officers findings above as well as the facts, findings, and conclusions of the bureau of development services in their administrative decision dated october 26, 2015 as modified by the bds staff memo (exhibit h. 15). Accordingly, the hearings officer issues the following approval:approval of a preliminary plan for a subdivision, that will result in 2 lots and 2 environmental resource tracts, as illustrated with exhibit c. 1-c. 7, subject to the following conditions:

Legalize demolition of single family residence removed in 1999. Cap sewer. Subject to 35 day demo delay. No fill greater than 24". Remove all foundations and debris. Demolition delay 35-day appeal period until 4: pm, tuesday, november 15, 2016. New multi-family building under 15-215564-co