ACTIVITY
PERMITS VALUATION
Get several free quotes from best contractors in your area.
| Content | Date | Cost | Contractor Rank | Address | Contractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 -lot (later 2-lot) single family subdivision transferred from king county. Although the city did not receive the actual file until 6-30-2009 the applicant submitted a request to the county (that was forwarded to the city) to allow the access to be closer to se 190th lane than allowed by county standards. The county recommended that the city deny the variance and require the access road to be located on the north side of the property. Variance request denied on september 17th 2008 by kayren kittrick. The county then continued to process the application under an interlocal agreement. The last information in the file seems to be correspondence from the applicants engineer proposing a two-lot scenario which would not be subject to the same rules as a 3-lot. No response from the county was included in the file. 8-10-09- king county check 363262 for 3374. In unused fees received. 8-24-09 - called the applicants engineer concept group to determine if the above was his understanding and to c Date: February 29, 2008Permit type: Land division | Permit status: Expired | Expiration date: June 25, 2015 | Permit id: Lua09-090 | Parcel: 6198400141 |