Jackie phillips

Phillips retaining wall

Phillips-deck expansion

Phillips retaining wall

Deck expansion

Jackie phillips

Building enforcement

Expand existing deck @ rear of the house. Clc; p & z staff recieved plans for review monday, october 24, 2005 property located in rs-4 residential single-family medium density district. Through lot with double road frontage with what appears to be a publ,ic unimproved right-of-way in the rear yard. As per udo subsection 7-10-2(e) , parcels abutting an alley at the rear of the lot are not considered through lots for rear yard setback requirements. Therefore, in accordance with udo, sec. 7-10-2. (f) (3) decks, steps, uncovered porches, patios, and terraces may encroach into a required rear setback, but no closer than six feet to the rear property line.; building safety review comments the approved plans with the attached review comments are required to be at the job site for use by the field inspector(s) at all times. The building permit is required to be posted at the jobsite at all times. Failure to post approved permits & plans at site is a fine, fine must b

Spoke with stewart and he advised that this permit be routed to grading due to the amount of dirt required and potential runoff issues. Also there is an issue as to ownership of property that the proposed "turn around" is being constructed on. It looks like a public thruway? :bld phillips retaining wall at driveway. Approximately 45lx5dx76"h. : bld; may 17, 2006 9:35:15 am ccox amendment: revised site plan reflecting changes to retaining wall at rear of property.; revised zoning permit site plan for construction of a retaining wall. The new retaining wall location has been revised from the original submittal. Wall shall be located entirely on the owners property. For zoning setback purposes, a wall or fence does not have to meet minimum setbacks if the wall is less than six feet in height. Therefore, no portion of the wall located within ten feet from the side property boundary shall exceed six feet in height. Swr june 21, 2006 11:05:17 am stuartr ; march 2, 2009 3:10:11 pm knee

May 12, 2006 2:50:51 pm ccox add additional living space and garage as shown on plans.; may 17, 2006 9:42:26 am ccox amendment: applicant submitting new site plans to show changes made to the site work. 06-2181 is the permit for the retaining wall, changes were made to the wall. Customer wanted those changes reflected on the site plans for the addition.; application was on hold for zoning as applicant drawn plan shows encroachments in front and rear yard. Applicant made flex request. Swr june 21,2006 11:08:22 am stuartr see also previous permit application 06-2181 for retaining wall. Swr june 21, 2006 11:09:06 am stuartr ; recd revised construction drawings. Pmd; august 28, 2006 10:55: am scarver additional plan rec. For stuart;scc; received, reviewed and approved revised zoning site plan for an addition to an existing single family home. Swr august 29, 2006 8:15:31 pm stuartr as per udo, sec. 7-11-6 (c.) (1) b. Shannon tuch, assistant planning director, appro

Deck expansion

Phillips retaining wall

Jackie phillips

Building enforcement

Phillips-deck expansion

Expand existing deck @ rear of the house. Clc; p & z staff recieved plans for review monday, october 24, 2005 property located in rs-4 residential single-family medium density district. Through lot with double road frontage with what appears to be a publ,ic unimproved right-of-way in the rear yard. As per udo subsection 7-10-2(e) , parcels abutting an alley at the rear of the lot are not considered through lots for rear yard setback requirements. Therefore, in accordance with udo, sec. 7-10-2. (f) (3) decks, steps, uncovered porches, patios, and terraces may encroach into a required rear setback, but no closer than six feet to the rear property line.; building safety review comments the approved plans with the attached review comments are required to be at the job site for use by the field inspector(s) at all times. The building permit is required to be posted at the jobsite at all times. Failure to post approved permits & plans at site is a fine, fine must b

Spoke with stewart and he advised that this permit be routed to grading due to the amount of dirt required and potential runoff issues. Also there is an issue as to ownership of property that the proposed "turn around" is being constructed on. It looks like a public thruway? :bld phillips retaining wall at driveway. Approximately 45lx5dx76"h. : bld; may 17, 2006 9:35:15 am ccox amendment: revised site plan reflecting changes to retaining wall at rear of property.; revised zoning permit site plan for construction of a retaining wall. The new retaining wall location has been revised from the original submittal. Wall shall be located entirely on the owners property. For zoning setback purposes, a wall or fence does not have to meet minimum setbacks if the wall is less than six feet in height. Therefore, no portion of the wall located within ten feet from the side property boundary shall exceed six feet in height. Swr june 21, 2006 11:05:17 am stuartr ; march 2, 2009 3:10:11 pm knee

May 12, 2006 2:50:51 pm ccox add additional living space and garage as shown on plans.; may 17, 2006 9:42:26 am ccox amendment: applicant submitting new site plans to show changes made to the site work. 06-2181 is the permit for the retaining wall, changes were made to the wall. Customer wanted those changes reflected on the site plans for the addition.; application was on hold for zoning as applicant drawn plan shows encroachments in front and rear yard. Applicant made flex request. Swr june 21,2006 11:08:22 am stuartr see also previous permit application 06-2181 for retaining wall. Swr june 21, 2006 11:09:06 am stuartr ; recd revised construction drawings. Pmd; august 28, 2006 10:55: am scarver additional plan rec. For stuart;scc; received, reviewed and approved revised zoning site plan for an addition to an existing single family home. Swr august 29, 2006 8:15:31 pm stuartr as per udo, sec. 7-11-6 (c.) (1) b. Shannon tuch, assistant planning director, appro