S family lot 1

Comment date: thu may 13 00:00: edt 2004 - 5/13/04 8:21:51 am grading waiver for lot 1;scc; comment date: mon may 17 00:00: edt 2004 - 1. Site must stay in compliance with all federal, state and local

Comment date: thu may 13 00:00: edt 2004 - 5/13/04 8:21:51 am grading waiver for lot 2;scc; comment date: mon may 17 00:00: edt 2004 - 1. Site must stay in compliance with all federal, state and local

Cauble street (batt associates)

5/13/04 8:21:51 am grading waiver for lot 2;scc; 1. Site must stay in compliance with all federal, state and local regulations. If site falls out of compliance for any of the agencies stated above, the project stands the chance of having a notice of violation issued against the project to shutting down the job and retracting the approval for the land disturbance. Please stay in compliance e. 2. If any of the minimum best management practices fail to adequately keep sedimentation on the site, it shall be the responsibility of the owner to correct. 3. Inspector assigned to this project is john fly and he can be reached at redacted phone number (office) or redacted phone number (cell) . He will keep a close eye on the job and if the land disturbance exceeds the wavier a permit will be required.

Single family lot 1;scc; appears to be a newly created subdivision with a new pin # redacted phone number49589. Plat recorded at b 101 p 192, unclear where proposed driveway is to be located. Appears to be a corner lot on an unopened ? Paper? Rights-of-way. Called applicant contact, requested they submit a building permit amendment site plan showing the property boundaries, location of proposed new construction footprint/outline and the related distances from the new construction to all property boundary lines and all rights-of-ways /easements. Left side of home must meet 7 1/2? Minimum street side setback. Swr april 5, 2005 1:56:58 pm stuartr ; received, reviewed and approved revised site plan. Submitted survey does not label land area to the left of structure as row, therefore left side setback remains normal district standard six feet (6?) swr april 18, 2005 1:48:34 pm stuartr see also adjoining parcel bp-05-1673 for shared driveway access; november 18, 2005 8:02

5/13/04 8:21:51 am grading waiver for lot 1;scc; comment date: mon may 17 00:00: edt 2004 - 1. Site must stay in compliance with all federal, state and local

5/13/04 8:21:51 am grading waiver for lot 2;scc; comment date: mon may 17 00:00: edt 2004 - 1. Site must stay in compliance with all federal, state and local

Cauble street (batt associates)

S/family lot 1

5 13 04 8:21:51 am grading waiver for lot 1;scc; comment date: mon may 17 00:00: edt 2004 - 1. Site must stay in compliance with all federal, state and local

5 13 04 8:21:51 am grading waiver for lot 2;scc; comment date: mon may 17 00:00: edt 2004 - 1. Site must stay in compliance with all federal, state and local

Single family lot 1;scc; appears to be a newly created subdivision with a new pin # redacted phone number49589. Plat recorded at b 101 p 192, unclear where proposed driveway is to be located. Appears to be a corner lot on an unopened ? Paper? Rights-of-way. Called applicant contact, requested they submit a building permit amendment site plan showing the property boundaries, location of proposed new construction footprint outline and the related distances from the new construction to all property boundary lines and all rights-of-ways easements. Left side of home must meet 7 1 2? Minimum street side setback. Swr april 5, 2005 1:56:58 pm stuartr ; received, reviewed and approved revised site plan. Submitted survey does not label land area to the left of structure as row, therefore left side setback remains normal district standard six feet (6?) swr april 18, 2005 1:48:34 pm stuartr see also adjoining parcel bp-05-1673 for shared driveway access; november 18, 2005 8:02

5 13 04 8:21:51 am grading waiver for lot 2;scc; 1. Site must stay in compliance with all federal, state and local regulations. If site falls out of compliance for any of the agencies stated above, the project stands the chance of having a notice of violation issued against the project to shutting down the job and retracting the approval for the land disturbance. Please stay in compliance e. 2. If any of the minimum best management practices fail to adequately keep sedimentation on the site, it shall be the responsibility of the owner to correct. 3. Inspector assigned to this project is john fly and he can be reached at redacted phone number (office) or redacted phone number (cell) . He will keep a close eye on the job and if the land disturbance exceeds the wavier a permit will be required.

S family lot 1